RFID Tag Incorporating At Least Two Integrated Circuits

ABSTRACT

Multiple RFID integrated circuit microradio chips are located at the feed point of an RFID tag antenna for greater, reliability, elimination of testing and to take advantage of coherent microradio operation for increased gain and power, better signal-to-noise ratios, improved range and low bit error rates.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 11/546,228 filed Oct. 11,2006 and claims rights under 35 USC §119(e) from U.S. ProvisionalApplication Ser. No. 60/726,145 filed. Oct. 13, 2005, the contents ofwhich are incorporated herein by reference. This application is relatedto PCT Patent Applications: US2006/033,111 filed. Aug. 24, 2006 byKenneth R. Erikson, entitled “RFID Tag and Method and Apparatus forManufacturing Same;” US2006/033,048 filed Aug. 24, 2006 by CourtRossman, Zane Lo, Roland. Gilbert and John Windyka, entitled “Methodsfor Coupling an RFID Chip to an Antenna;” US2006/033,049 filed Aug. 24,2006 by Steve A. Hedges and Kenneth R. Erikson, entitled “Method andApparatus For Coupling Multiple Microradios To an RFID Tag Antenna;”US2006/033,112 filed Aug. 24, 2006 by Karl D. Brommer and Kenneth R.Erikson, entitled “Coherent Multichip RFID Tag and Method and Apparatusfor Creating such Coherence;” and US2006/024,630, filed. Jun. 23, 2006by Daniel N. Carothers and entitled “CMOS Process for Fabrication ofUltra-small and Non-standard Size or Shape Semiconductor Die.” Thecontents of these applications are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the use of Radio Frequency Identification(RFID) tags for tracking items during shipping, receiving the items atfinal destination and inventory control of items and more particularlyto the use of multiple integrated circuit microradios at the feed pointof a tag antenna.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

RFID tags are becoming a well-established method for tracking materialsduring shipping and storage. In many applications they replace theprinted bar code labels on items because they do not require a closeproximity for the automatic reader. RFID tags that conform to theISO/IEC 18000 or epcGlobal standards also can contain significantly moredata than a printed bar code label and can be modified en route toinclude waypoint or, other information.

There are two main classes of RFID tags: passive and active. A passivetag derives its energy for operation from the RF field of the reader andresponds to the reader by modulating the reflectivity of its antenna,thereby returning varying amounts of the incident RF energy. An activetag responds to the reader using RF energy derived from a battery on thetag.

Present RFID tags are fabricated by electrically bonding a single customintegrated circuit (IC) microradio to a substrate containing a printedcircuit antenna. The usual fabrication method, well known in theelectronics industry is flip-chip bonding using pick-and-place machines.

However, the use of a single integrated circuit microradio chip presentscertain problems. First is the operability of the chip itself.Production yields for the IC are not high enough to guaranteeoperability without testing. Testing individual ICs either prior to tagmounting or after tag manufacture is a very costly and complicatedprocedure, especially when tags are miniaturized for item-level tagging.Also pick-and-place techniques cannot guarantee proper chip coupling tothe antenna due to the small sizes involved. Moreover, ever smallersizes are desirable to reduce the cost of the chips and thus the cost ofthe tag to under 5 cents, necessitating other chip mounting techniques.

One such chip mounting technique is described in PCT Application SerialNo. US2006/033,111 filed Aug. 24, 2006 by Kenneth R. Erikson, entitled“RFID Tag and Method and Apparatus for Manufacturing Same,” whichdescribes a method for fabricating a low cost RFID tag wherein at leasttwo integrated circuits, and preferably hundreds, are deposited at thefeed point of the tag antenna. In one embodiment the integrated circuitmicroradio chips are mixed in a non-conductive slurry that is printedonto the antenna feed point, followed by patterning electrodes andprogramming.

PCT Application Serial No. US2006/033,112 filed Aug. 24, 2006 by Karl D.Brommer and Kenneth R. Erikson, entitled “Coherent Multichip RFID Tagand Method and Apparatus for Creating such Coherence,” describes amethod for causing the multiple integrated circuit microradio chips towork together cooperatively.

Causing these microradio chips to work cooperatively also can includepolarization control described in PCT Patent Application No.US2006/033,112, filed Aug. 24, 2005 by Steve A. Hedges et al.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

In order to reduce the overall price of RFID tags and to increasereliability as well as increase range and/or provide a bettersignal-to-noise ratio that results in better bit error rates, in thesubject invention multiple integrated circuit microradio chips arecoupled to the tag antenna at its feed point. Then these microradiochips are made to operate in a cooperative or coherent fashion.

As used herein, the microradio chips are said to be coheretized in thatall of the microradio chips coupled to a single RFID tag antenna feedpoint produce signals that are identical in amplitude and phase.Moreover, for microradio chips that present a particular polarization,the polarization is reversible so that the polarizations of all of themicroradio chips are the same. Further, when microradios are depositedat the feed point of the tag antenna, only those that are properlycoupled to the feed point are activated.

How these microradios are deposited at the feed point of the antenna isdiscussed in PCT Application Serial No. US2006/033111 filed Aug. 24,2006 by Kenneth R. Erikson, entitled “RFID Tag and Method and Apparatusfor Manufacturing Same;” whereas coherent operation is discussed in PCTApplication Serial No. US2006/033112 filed. Aug. 24, 2006 by Karl D.Brommer and Kenneth R. Erikson, entitled “Coherent Multichip RFID Tagand Method and Apparatus for Creating such Coherence.” Polarizationcontrol is covered in PCT Patent Application Serial No. US2006/033049filed on Aug. 24, 2006 by Steve A. Hedges and Kenneth R. Erikson,entitled “Method and Apparatus For Coupling Multiple Microradios To anRFID Tag Antenna.”

The result of using more than one integrated circuit at the feed pointof a tag antenna is first and foremost that one does not have to testeach and every integrated circuit. This is because, when using hundredsor thousands of microradios at the feed point of the antenna, theprobability of failure when raised to the n power results in anegligible failure probability. This eliminates the requirement oftesting either the integrated circuits themselves or the coupling of theintegrated circuits to the feed point of the antenna. Moreover, becauseof the numbers of microradio chips at the antenna feed point,reliability is increased.

Additionally, when the microradios are coheretized as described above,then the gain of power output is increased.

When such coherent operation is achieved one can, for instance, powerand read the RFID tags from as far away as one kilometer due to thepower gain that enables a wide variety of tracking applications.

Also, with the power gain associated with coheretized chips, one obtainsa better signal-to-noise ratio. This in turn translates either into abetter bit error rate or alternatively an increase in range.

Thus for RFID tags used in tracking; assuming appropriate reader power,one can, for instance, track trucks, vehicles, livestock, or individualitems from afar.

If in addition, during the programming of the multiple integratedcircuit microradio chips, one can correct for polarization reversals,then the ability of the microradio chips to work together is increaseddue to the identical polarization directions of the microradio chips,which minimizes inter-chip interference.

Further, during programming it is possible to activate only thoseintegrated circuit microradio chips that are tightly coupled to the tagantenna, again increasing power or gain.

Finally, as a result of the ink jet fabrication techniques involvingdeposit of multiple microradio chips at an antenna feed point, costlypick-and-place machines are avoided.

In short, the use of more than one integrated circuit microradio chip atthe feed point of an RFID tag antenna significantly reduces the cost ofthe RFID tags and does not involve pick-and-place machines, which areexpensive. The use of large numbers of microradio chips also completelyeliminates the requirement for testing. Additionally, due to the use ofmultiple integrated circuit microradio chips working in concert, one hasgreater reliability, more output power, greater range and/or better biterror rates depending on the tradeoffs involved.

In summary, multiple RFID integrated circuit microradio chips arelocated at the feed point of an RFID tag antenna for greaterreliability, elimination of testing and to take advantage of coherentmicroradio operation for increased gain and power, bettersignal-to-noise ratios, improved range and low bit error rates. Havinglarge numbers of integrated circuit microradio chips at the feed pointof an RFID tag antenna, when coheretized, polarization controlled andorientation-controlled results in a low-cost RFID tag in which nopick-and-place costs are necessitated and in which testing requirementsare eliminated. The provision of multiple integrated circuit microradiochips also results in better reliability, more power, greater range andbetter bit error rates.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features of the subject invention will be betterunderstood in connection with the Detailed Description, in conjunctionwith the Drawings, of which:

FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of the connection of a singleintegrated circuit microradio chip across the feed point of a loopantenna;

FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic illustration of the utilization of multipleintegrated circuit microradio chips at the feed point of the loopantenna of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic illustration of the deposition of multiplemicroradio chips in a non-conductive fluid at the feed point of a loopantenna in which the microradios are coupled to the feed point of theantenna, also illustrating the interrogation of the multiple integratedcircuit microradios through the use of a reader;

FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic illustration of the use, of two fluids and aprinting process for depositing a number of integrated circuitmicroradios at the feed point of an antenna as well as the patterning ofconductive material so as to be able to couple the deposited microradiosto the antenna feed point;

FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic illustration of a number of integrated circuitmicroradio chips having a three-dimensional contact structure in whichthe indicated microradio chips have their electrodes coupled between oneside of the feed point of the antenna and the overlying conductiveelement the other side of the feed point of the tag antenna;

FIG. 6 is a diagrammatic illustration of the depositing of a number ofintegrated circuit microradio chips on an interdigitated fingerstructure provided at the feed point of a loop antenna, so that numbersof integrated circuit microradio chips may be coupled to the feed pointof the tag antenna;

FIG. 7 is a diagrammatic illustration of integrated circuit microradioscarried in a non-conductive fluid, some of which are selected foroperation due to the orientation of the microradio chip with respect tothe feed point of the antenna; and,

FIG. 8 is a diagrammatic illustration of the selection of thecoheretization of microradio chips during a programming process throughthe use of a pseudo-random number generator and a seed to determinetransmission time slot for providing coherent operation of all of themicroradio chips at the feed point of a tag antenna.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

By way of further background, radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tagshave been utilized extensively to trace pallets of merchandise from apoint of shipment to a final destination. The tags are typically passivedevices that are read out with RF energy, usually in the 900 MHz range.These passive devices are parasitically powered by the RF energyimpinging upon the antenna of the tag, thus powering the integratedcircuits within the tag, with the result that the tag transmits theidentity of the pallet in response to a probing signal from a reader inthe vicinity of the tag.

While such RFID tags are now mandated for pallets in some industries,there is increased level of interest in item-level tagging, whichinvolves placing a tag on the item itself as opposed to on a pallet ofitems.

However, in order to be able to make such tagging strategies possiblefor low-value items such as toothpaste and the like, techniques arerequired to be able to manufacture and deposit the tags on items at anoverall cost of no more than 5 cents per item or less.

The relatively low price for the tagging of items is not so important inhigh-value items such as pharmaceuticals, where the tag price may be asmuch as 25 or 50 cents from start to finish. Rather, mass merchants areinterested in keeping track of how much material is on their shelves forinventory control.

This means that, for short ranges, an individual carries a reader withhim- or herself and probes the individual items, either in a walk-byscenario or as the items come into the facility, for instance on aconveyor belt. Also envisioned are so-called “smart shelves”, in whichthe current stock of goods on a merchant's shelves can be remotelymonitored and restocked as required.

Note that RFID technology is not merely a bar code technology, butrather one that can store data and, upon request from a reader, outputdata to a global database. The data can be as simple as a product IDcode.

The desideratum using item-level RFID tags is that the whole shipmenthistory of a product from the time it leaves the manufacturing plant toits final destination can be tracked through various hands such asshippers, importers, wholesalers and warehousemen.

If in, its simplest embodiment the RFID tag merely contains anidentification number, this number is read out along the way duringshipment such that the transport history of the item can be ascertained.

It is noted that the current tags are passive tags in that they do notrequire or have a battery. This is useful because in item-level tagging,low cost is key, there is no space available for batteries and batteryshelf life is not a problem.

With respect to tagging of a pallet, it is noted that a pallet isusually placed on a forklift truck and is driven, for instance, into awarehouse where it passes through the warehouse door at which a readeris located. The reader sends out RF energy that charges up the passivetag by transferring energy to the integrated circuits within the tag.The reader then transmits a special code that interrogates the RFIDelectronics so as to output the tag ID and any other related informationstored by the tag.

These passive devices have a range of approximately 30 feet, given thefact that the Federal Communications Commission limits the amount ofradiated power from the reader to be 1 watt.

As to the size of the tags that are currently placed on pallets, theyare on the order of 2 inches by 2 inches, with the antenna dimensionsbeing the dominating factor. It is noted that the larger the antenna,the greater the range, since a larger tag antenna can capture moreenergy from a reader. For short-range applications such as monitoringpill bottle inventories, the antenna can be indeed quite small.

Note that with small antennas the amount of energy available for theintegrated circuits making up the tag is limited, with the energy beingderived from a so-called rectenna that rectifies the RF energy andstores it on a capacitor. In these cases the energy from the capacitoris utilized to power up the circuitry that includes some kind of logicor even a microcomputer as well as a transmitter. Note that once thecircuit is powered up the information is transmitted back to the reader.

Using the above tags to identify pallets is commonplace. However, theintegrated circuits are relatively expensive, with the integratedcircuit tending to be the most expensive part. Secondary to the expenseof the integrated circuit itself is the cost involved in building thetag.

If pallets, for instance, contain high value items, a 50- or 75-cent tagmay be affordable; however, for item level tags the cost needs to bekept under 5 cents or less.

Moreover, for item-level tags, the output of the transmitter of the RFIDtag is in general in the microwatt range due to the small size antennarequired. However, with sufficient size reduction there should be aconcomitant cost reduction at least of the integrated circuits. If onecould make the integrated circuits very, very small, in the tens ofmicron size, the cost per IC die goes down dramatically. This is becauseif one can utilize large wafers, one can make millions of individual dieper wafer. With processing costs constant and sufficient yields, one cantherefore reduce the cost of the tag under 5 cents.

For item-level tags, for instance on individual pill containers, one canarrange to have antennas that are perhaps a quarter of an inch on aside, with a tiny integrated circuit on them. However, even if one couldmake the micron-sized RFID tags, one is faced with a significantchallenge in how to locate an RED integrated circuit on the associatedantenna at its feed point.

In an effort to reduce the cost of the individual chips, manufacturinglarge numbers of them on a large-size wafer, while theoreticallyreducing the cost of these chips, the individual chips are extremelyhard to test and hard to handle. What is conventionally done now, atleast for pallet-level RFID tags, is to use “pick-and-place” machinesand size the individual integrated circuits to be at least large enoughto enable the pick-and-place operation. Thus, the integrated circuitsmust be of a size that they can be taken off some kind of dispensingapparatus and physically moved where they can be deposited on andelectrically connected to the antenna.

However, pick-and-place machines currently are limited to integratedcircuits that are larger than a millimeter on a side.

If one could break, through the barrier imposed by pick-and-placemachines, for instance utilizing different deposition techniques, thenone could garner the cost savings of manufacturing millions ofintegrated circuits on a single wafer. It would therefore be extremelyuseful in reducing the overall price of the RFID tag to be able to haveintegrated circuits as small as a 10^(th) of a millimeter on a side.Manufacturing of such small integrated circuits is possible withstandard 90-nanometer integrated circuit technology. Even 65-nanometertechnology in high volume applications is now state of the art.

However, just because one can lay down patterns that have 90-nanometerline widths or less, a serious limitation is the ability to be able toscribe and break the individual ICs apart from the die. Note thatvarious scribing, breaking, and sawing techniques have been used in thepast to separate out individual integrated circuits.

Using sawing, for example, the saw blade dimensions defines the kerf,which is the material that the saw blade requires in the removal ofmaterial. Note that in the applications being discussed herein, the kerfis larger than the desired size of the chips. This results in veryinefficient use of a wafer and therefore added cost per die.

With laser scribing, smaller kerfs may be available. However, thermalissues limit this type of scribing technique to chip dimensions that arestill larger than desirable.

Chemical etching is another alternative method. However, conventionalapproaches lead to severe undercutting of the die, again adding to thekerf dimensions. There is, however, a unique chemical etching processthat limits undercutting in which microscopic die can be formedutilizing standard CMOS processes.

Assuming that one can separate out the microscopic chips, mounting anindividual chip to an antenna feed point can be accomplished through theuse of a shaped die and a specially shaped receiver cavity. In suchso-called “self-assembly methods”, these shaped die are squeegeed overin a slurry across a substrate that has one receiver cavity for oneantenna feed point in which the cavity is adapted to uniquely hold thespecially-shaped die.

This type of self-assembly method, illustrated in U.S. Pat. No.6,864,570 and licensed to Alien Technology, requires a match between theorientation of the die and the receptacle. Thus the specially shaped ICshave to match the corresponding cavities and if they are randomlyoriented in the slurry, they will either not enter the cavity or not beappropriately positioned in the cavity. The result is that thereliability of the RFID tags when manufactured in this and other similarprocesses often results in failure rates of 0.5 to 10% that are whollyunacceptable.

In order to eliminate those RFID tags that are inoperative, one musttest the tag before applying it to a package, which is anothertime-consuming and costly procedure that may not be totally successfulwhen microscopic integrated circuit-type tags are involved.

Multiple Integrated Circuit Microradio Chips At an Antenna Feed Point

What is therefore needed is first a manufacturing technique formanufacturing RFID tags that reduces the cost of the individualintegrated circuit by reducing the size of the integrated circuits; andsecondly a technique for coupling multiple integrated circuits to thefeed point of the antenna in a way that virtually guarantees a 100%yield while at the same time eliminating the use of pick-and-placemachines.

Referring now to FIG. 1, for an RFID tag 10 a substrate 12 is provided,in one embodiment with a printed circuit antenna 14 in the form of aloop that has a feed point 16 at which is coupled an integrated circuitmicroradio 20. It is the purpose of the microradio to parasiticallyobtain power from a reader whose energy is collected by antenna 14 andis utilized to power the circuits of the microradio prior tointerrogating the integrated circuit for whatever information is carriedtherein. The information can be simple bar-coding information or rathersophisticated information which, upon probing by a reader, istransmitted out through, antenna 14 to the reader.

Such integrated circuit microradios are described in the aforementionedPCT Patent. Application US2006/033,111 assigned to the assignee hereofand incorporated herein by reference.

As explained above, it is only with difficulty that one can properlyorient and couple an integrated circuit microradio 20 to the feed point16 of antenna 14.

There are two issues with the proper operation of such a singlemicroradio embodiment. First is the question of whether the integratedcircuit is functional at all and secondly, whether or not there isproper coupling between the integrated circuit microradio and the feedpoint of the antenna.

In the past, manufacturers of RFID tags have had to test a completed tagfor operability. However, as illustrated in FIG. 2, if one were to beable to locate multiple integrated circuit microradio chips 20 at feedpoint 16 of antenna 14, then a number of advantageous results occur.

First, if one could locate numbers of microradios at the feed point, atleast some of them will be operative and at least some of them will beproperly coupled to the antenna feed point. As the number of microradiosdeposited at the antenna feed point increases, then the likelihood ofthere being a malfunctioning tag goes to zero depending on the number ofmicroradios involved at the feed point.

If one can deposit a number of randomly oriented microradios at the feedpoint, then depending on the number of microradios the probability offailure for a given RFID tag falls dramatically, thus obviating the needfor testing.

Also discussed in US2006/033,111 is a system for being able to deposit alarge number of integrated circuit microradios at the feed point of anantenna.

Referring now to FIG. 3, what is described is a number of randomlyoriented microradio chips 20 located in a non-conductive fluid such as anon-conductive ink 21, which is printed or deposited over the gap 22 ofa feed point to antenna 14 which includes spaced-apart conductiveportions 24 and 26.

With the integrated circuit microradio chips 20 mixed in with thenon-conductive ink 21 and deposited at feed point 16, then byoverprinting the non-conductive ink with a patterned conductive fluid28, one can couple the microradios to the antenna at the antenna feedpoint.

As will be discussed, when the microradios are programmed from a reader30 which emits an interrogation signal 32 from an antenna 34, theprogramming of the microradios can establish the tag identity, andvarious other factors that result in coherent operation of themicroradios at the feed point as well as polarity selection andorientation selection so that when the microradios work in concert, notonly is a robust signal achievable from antenna 14, the cost of the tagis dramatically reduced and tag failure rates plummet to close to zero.

As described in the above-mentioned patent application, in oneembodiment an integrated circuit layer is provided with a plethora ofindividual microradio chips designed and fabricated according totechniques well known in the industry. In one embodiment a microradiochip, when diced from a wafer, includes a base semiconductor materialcontaining the circuitry in a layer-above the base material. This layeris actually composed of several sub-layers of integrated circuitmaterials and conductive materials, with a top sub-layer being of anelectrical shield as is common in integrated circuits.

An electrically insulating layer is applied over the electrical, shield,whereas on top of this layer is formed an electrically conductive layerthat is connected electrically to the appropriate part of the IC layer,with this layer serving as one connection to an antenna. The integratedcircuit microlayer also is provided with a further conducting layerapplied to the bottom side off the substrate, with this layer beingconnected to the appropriate part of the IC layer and serves as theother connection to the antenna.

What is accomplished by this fabrication technique is a microradiohaving two contacts with two opposed conducting layers, with themicroradio having an inherent polarization due to the dipole structurethus provided.

Referring to FIG. 4, what is illustrated is a method of manufacture ofthe subject tag. In this example, the tag is printed directly onto theend item. End item 80 is shown on a conveyor 82, moving past printerhead 84. Printer head 84 is mounted on adjustable arm 94 and base 96,which may contain control electronics. Conductive ink 86 is held inreservoir 87, which is connected to print head 84 by conduit 91.Reservoir 88 contains a mixture of microradio chips 20 suspended innonconductive fluid 89. Reservoir 88 is connected to print head 84 byconduit 92.

As item 80 moves past print head 84, antenna 14 is first printed ontoend item 80 using conductive ink 86. More than one microradio chip isthen dispensed from print head 84 into the drying ink and in the correctlocation with respect to antenna 14's feed point, where one or more ofthe contacts will be embedded in the drying ink and thus be connected tothe antenna. A second portion of patterned conductive ink 86 is thenapplied over microradios 20 to complete the electrical connection toantenna 14 by connecting another contact to another portion of theantenna. Note that layer 100 floats on top of liquid 89 and is notmiscible with the non-conducting fluid. It will be appreciated that thesame result could be achieved by moving arm 94 over a stationary enditem 80.

FIG. 5 illustrates a cross-section of the tags in the region of antenna14 where several microradio chips 20 are located, which will serve toclarify the manufacturing process described in FIG. 4. Antenna 14 isapplied to end item 80. Microradio chips 20 are dispersed innonconductive fluid 89. Electrical connection between the microradiosand antenna 14 is then established by conductive ink layer 100.

Furthermore, it will be appreciated that some of the microradio chips 20may be correctly connected between an antenna, here shown at 50, andlayer 100. However, many will be either shorted out by conductive fluidor not connected at all. More importantly, some of the microradios thatare connected may have electrode 36 connected to layer 100 and some mayhave electrode 38 connected to this layer. This creates a situationwherein these two forms of connect compete with each other or in somecases cancel each other out completely.

Now referring back to FIG. 3, a programming device is used to select oneconnection and disconnect the other, thus providing a workable tag. Thisprogramming device may be a simple fuse and diode in one preferredembodiment. For integrated circuit design considerations, it may bepreferable to use an anti-fuse approach instead. Other programmableelements, for example, one that automatically recognizes the correctconnection may be used.

It will be appreciated that only those integrated circuit microradiosthat are properly connected from layer 86 to layer 100 will be activatedduring the programming process due to their appropriate connectionacross the feed point of the antenna.

One method of assuring that multiple integrated circuit microradios areconnected to the feed point of an antenna is shown in FIG. 6, in whichantenna 14 has an interdigitated feed.

Referring to FIG. 6, antenna 14, which is in this case a loop antenna,is provided with an interdigitated feed 70 that contains a series oftines 72 connected at feed point 70 to a portion 74 of antenna 14.

Likewise, interdigitated tines 76 are interdigitated between tines 72and are electrically connected to a portion 78 of antenna 14.

Thus the feed region 70 of the antenna has a large interdigitated gap.For quick and inexpensive placement of a chip, the chip can be randomlyplaced on the interdigitated gap at the antenna feed, where the gap ismade the same size as the separation between the two pads on the chip.Chip dimensions should be minimized for economy of manufacture, with thechip dimensions also being determined by RF components and paddimensions. The 2:1 aspect ratio of the chip allows only those chipsthat are correctly placed to make contact with the antenna by bridgingthe gap between the interdigitated tines or fingers.

In general, the chip should be long enough to cross the two disconnectedadjacent tines. However, they should not be so long as to cross threetines because the chip could potentially make contact with two tines onthe same side of the antenna feed, and the chip will be ineffective. Thedimensions of the interdigitated tines can be optimized for thedimensions, of the chip, or the chip can be optimized for the dimensionsof the tines. In either case, there should be approximately equalspacing for the tines and for the pads on the chip. The pad structure onthe chip can be narrower, with a high aspect ratio, or triangular, tomaximize probability of contact. Each individual pad should not be largeenough to cause shorting across the gap.

Here microradio chips 20 are randomly deposited over the tines of theinterdigitated feed so that at least one chip will be properly alignedacross the gap between the tines, thereby establishing a direct DCconnection of the microradio across the tines of the feed point of theantenna.

The chips can be painted on, blown on or dispensed similar to inkjetprinting. The last method is disclosed in the aforementioned PCTApplication US2006/033,111. As will be seen, this method isprobabilistic. This means that it is, highly probable given a largenumber of microradios dispensed on the interdigitated, structure that atleast some microradio chips will be properly positioned across adjacenttines of the interdigitated feed structure.

This method does not require precise orientation and positioning of thechip on the feed region if one or more chips are used. It is noted thatmagnetostatic, electrostatic or photoconductive orientation methods maybe used to ensure orientation and positioning of the chips.

As will be appreciated, the proper orientation of chips 20 acrossadjacent tines 72 and 76 is such that conductive ends 77 and 78 directlyattach to the opposed tines.

Polarization Control

Referring now to FIG. 7, whether or not that one has direct DC couplingbetween the end pieces of an integrated circuit microradio, it ispossible to obtain electromagnetic coupling between conductive portions52 and 54 of antenna 14.

With a rectilinear structure for the RFID chip, this type of structurehaving opposed contact pads or tabs results in a preferentialpolarization direction for the RFID chip.

In essence, opposed metallic end caps provide a dipole structure for thetransmission of information to and from the RFID chip.

Assuming that one has two chips, located at the feed point of a tagantenna, then it is important that the polarization direction of thesechips be aligned one with the other. To this end, a chip may have anE-field vector at time T₀ parallel to the E-field vector of another RFIDchip.

Thus at time T₀ the E-field vectors are parallel to each other and inthe same direction.

As will be appreciated, these E-fields will exist at T₀+π radians, witha change in the direction of the RF signal applied to the end tabs orconductors of the chip.

Due to the instantaneous E-field direction at time T₀ and the opposedfield direction at time T₀+π radians, the outputs of these twoidentically constructed microradios or RFID chips will add coherently.

Should, however, the chips be oriented such that one has a northorientation for its. E-field vector and the other a south orientation,then it is quite clear that the energy from these chips will cancel eachother.

As seen in FIG. 7, microradio chips 20 can be electromagneticallycoupled to the feed point of an antenna described by conductive traces120 and 122 by providing a substrate 124 with a conductive trace 126that connects to one side of the antenna and forms a feed point to theantenna, whereas a conductive trace 128 connects to the other side ofthe antenna at its feed point.

As illustrated, a non-conductive slurry 130 contains randomly orientedmicroradio chips 20 that are disposed in the slurry or fluid.

The conductive trace-128 is coupled to the microradios through anoverlying conductive ink trace 122, which overlies the slurry containingthe microradios such that RF energy from the microradios will be coupledto the feed point of the antenna due to RF coupling techniques.

The gain of the individual microradios may not be sufficient to enablecoupling energy to and from the microradios to the antenna and viceversa. However, by providing a large number of microradios in the gapbetween traces 122 and 126, if coherent operation is achieved, one canincrease overall output so that when added together there is sufficientsignal strength.

There are two issues that must be addressed in order to obtainsufficient gain for this non-direct DC coupled embodiment and that, isthat one needs to be able to select microradio chips that have apredetermined orientation, in this case a vertical orientation asindicated by vertical dotted lines 134. It will be noted that the shadedmicroradio chips 20 are oriented such that they are, for instance,within 30 degrees of a vertical established as being perpendicular tothe top surface of substrate 124 and the plane of the antenna feedtraces.

The ability to select for activation only microradios having thisvertical orientation or indeed any predetermined orientation isimportant to the obtaining of the maximum amount of gain from theensemble of microradios in the slurry.

In one embodiment this is simply accomplished by activating only thosemicroradios having a vertical orientation, meaning that the programmingpower picked up by the antenna will only be of sufficient level toactivate microradios in a predetermined orientation. Other radios thatare located at orientations that are non-optimal will not receive enoughof a signal from the programming step to cause the programming code tobe received by the microradios. Assuming improper physical orientation,the microradios may not be able to be parasitically powered. Thus if theorientation direction of the microradios is suboptimal such as, forinstance, as illustrated by the orientation of microradio 138, it maynot be able to be parasitically powered.

Moreover, for instance, if a microradio is vertically oriented withrespect to traces 122 and 126, this microradio can have a polarizationdirection such that north points up and south points down, with theE-field associated therewith oriented south pointing down and theE-field vector pointing up. Alternatively, the orientation can bereversed.

As mentioned hereinbefore, if vertically oriented microradios in oneembodiment have opposite polarization directions, then there will bephase cancellation of the outputs of these radios, which deleteriouslyaffects the operation.

In short, if the microradios are envisaged as having a cubic structure,with opposed conductive tabs, then for a north-facing polarizationorientation, a signal source can be appropriately connected.

If the connection from the signal source is reversed, then thepolarization of the microradio will be in a southerly or down position.This polarization can be switched during programming by sensinginversion of a digital code.

Coherent Microradio Operation

With respect to the ability to have the integrated circuit microradiosoperate in a coherent fashion and referring now to FIG. 8, one method ofproviding the coherence is to provide each and every one of theintegrated circuit microradio chips with an identical, feed for theirpseudo-random number generator. When this is done, each of themicroradios will produce the exact same signal at the exact same timewhen probed by an interrogating signal from a reader.

Assuming that all integrated circuit microradio chips are appropriatelyactivated, programmed, and coupled to the antenna feed, there is arequirement that when interrogated, all of these microradios transmit atthe same time and with the same data so that they work togethercooperatively or coherently. It is desired that these microradios whenproperly coupled and activated will act in unison so that the signalsfrom the tags will add cooperatively and not destructively. If they adddestructively the information transmitted will be garbled. If they addcooperatively, the transmission will not be garbled. Also, withcooperative adding there is a quadratic power level, enhancement suchthat the minuscule outputs of the microradios add to provide a morerobust tag output signal. Note that a tag made in this fashion will beindistinguishable from a convention single chip tag.

If these RFID chips implement the so-called slotted ALOHA protocol orother similar communications protocols, then these chips would by designtransmit at different times and be in different time slots.

The purpose of these protocols is to address the problem of so-called“collisions” between RFID tags that transmit at the same time. This wasaccomplished by utilizing a pseudo-random number generator to controlthe time at which a tag would transmit. Upon an interrogation signal,the pseudo-random generators generate different numbers to set differenttime slots for transmission so that the tags would have a staggeredoutput that would be readable by the reader.

In normal operation, the reader sends out a burst of RF energy and anytag that can receive this energy uses this RF energy to charge up somekind of energy storage like a capacitor that is inside the tag. Theelectronics in the tags then begin to work and the reader then sends outa query command that says, “OK, is there anybody out there and if you'reout there, please respond to me.”

In the simplest case, only one tag is queried and responds to indicateits presence. The reader then acknowledges the existence of the tag andrequests the tag information. In, one embodiment, the tag then sendsback the information, in a simple 96-bit code that would be a uniqueidentifier for the item or product that it is on. The reader thenacknowledges receipt of the information and causes the tag to turn off.

As will be appreciated, this standard protocol was devised for the casewhere one has tags having outputs that collide with each other. In onescenario there might be 50 tags or 100 tags all charged up and ready togo. The reader sends out a query command and, for instance, two of thosetags respond in the same time slot. The reader recognizes the collisionand asks the tags to try again. Those tags that collided go through aprocess to pick out a different time slot to respond in and afterwardsdo not collide with each other.

This change of time slot is done by a pseudo-random number generator.The pseudo-random number generator takes a stored seed-number and, usesa software program or firmware to generate another number. Each of thetags that have collided has a different seed in them to cause thepseudo-random number generator to output a different time slot number.

After the two colliding tags have picked out new time slots to respondin, the reader comes back and queries the tags again. Then the tagresponds at its designated time slot in a normal way, with the other tagthen responding in a different time slot. Thus the signals from the twotags are disambiguated.

If one has 50 tags or 100 tags, there is a higher probability ofcollision and maybe even some probability of multiple collisions. Tosolve the multiple collisions problem, the above process is invokedsequentially until all 50 or 100 tags are read out.

While the slotted ALOHA protocol is useful in reading out different tagson different items, in item level tagging addressed by the microminiature radios, described herein, if these microradios or RFID chipsuse the slotted ALOHA protocol and transmit at different times, not onlycould there be destructive interference, there could be no cumulativesignal strength increase due to coherent transmission.

With multiple microradio chips in a single tag, the tag must respondjust like any other single chip tag. All of the chips within the tagmust therefore respond in an identical manner to the reader andcooperate with each other. The word, “cooperate” is another word for thefact that the microradio chip outputs have to be coherent with eachother. They have to send out the same kind of data, and they have topick the same time slot using the pseudo-random number generator. To theoutside world, the outside world cannot and should not ever know thatthere are multiple chips on this single tag. Since these chips aredesignated to meet standard protocols, coherence is achieved as follows:

First, the tags are programmed at the time they are placed on an item.During that programming phase, all of the microradio RFID chips on anindividual tag are programmed with the same seed for their pseudo-randomnumber generators. Because the pseudo-random number generator alwaysgives the same time delays, all chips will transmit their information tothe tag antenna in the same time slot.

When the tag is charged up by the reader, the tag electronics turn on.As a result, each chip in the tag is active. The reader then sends out aquery and each chip then individually responds and sends a signal outthrough the common antenna, with all chips sending out the same kind ofsignal. These are on/off digital signals in which the ones and zeroescome out at the same time from each of these chips.

The way to ensure that all chips send out signals in the same time slotis that each of the chips is provided with the same seed for thepseudo-random number generator during programming. Because of the use ofthe identical pseudo-random number generators in the chips, whenprovided an identical seed, each of the transmitters in the chips willtransmit in the same time slot.

What happens in the case where one has numbers of these tags is thateach of the tags is programmed with a different seed for its chips, sothat collisions will not occur. If they do occur, the signals from thereader instruct different tags to install different seeds in differenttags. This means that the original seed used to create coherence ischanged for each of the microradios in its tag. The subject system worksjust like the standard case, with the result being that each tag isprogrammed to transmit in a different time slot.

Thus initially, in the subject invention each tag is programmed with adifferent seed during attachment to an item. This seed is changed iflater on there are collisions. Note that the seeds for a tag can beprogrammed at the time of applying the RFID label to a package. Thusbefore the product ever leaves the manufacturer to move to themerchandiser, it is programmed both with an ID and a seed.

Since all of the above microradios have non-volatile memory, duringprogramming one can write in the 96-bit product code and the seed. As aresult, it is in the programming phase where the differences among thetags are generated.

In short, within a tag having multiple microradios, all have the sameseed and work coherently. For different tags, however, they areinitially programmed with different seeds so that they will transmit indifferent time slots.

More specifically, if each of the microradios at the feed point of anantenna is programmed to transmit simultaneously by using the samepseudo-random number generator with the same seed, then the microradioswill act in unison or coherently. This will also have the beneficialeffect of increasing the signal strength of the signal applied to theantenna.

As described in the aforementioned patent applications, each of theindividual microradios or RFID chips is selectively activated and isalso provided with a non-volatile memory into which an ID code isprogrammed from a programming station.

Thus, utilizing the standard slotted ALOHA protocol described in detailin the ISO/IEC 18000 or epcGlobal™ standards as well as in the RFIDhandbook, one can construct microradios or RFID chips that can be madeto operate in a coherent fashion in response to an interrogating signal.

In summary, for coherency one must make all of the microradios at thefeed point of an RFID tag antenna transmit at the same time withprecisely the same information so as to avoid destructive interferenceand achieve the signal level increase associated with multiplemicroradios transmitting at the same time through the same antenna.

Referring to FIG. 8, one way of providing coherence for each of themicroradios is to assure that they transmit in the same time slot.

In one embodiment an RFID chip 140 includes a time slot selector 142which is inside controller 144 that includes a pseudo-random numbergenerator 146. This type of controller, be it a software or a firmwarecontroller, is structured in accordance with the standardizedanti-collision time slot protocols, with the pseudo-random numbergenerator originally designed to output different numbers to establishrandom time slots.

However, in the subject invention this same architecture is utilized toensure that each of the RFID microradios all transmit identicalinformation in the same time slot.

It will be appreciated that an RFID microradio chip includes a receiverand decoder 148 which receives signals from a programming device andinstalls seed 150 into a non-volatile memory on the chip, in this caseSEED A.

The time slot selection unit 142 activates transmitter key 152, which inturn keys transmitter 154 on to output the programmed ID code and otherdata stored in non-volatile storage 156, with transmitter 154 modulatedby modulator 158 to transmit the digital information stored in unit 156.

In operation, the signal from the reader is first a tone burst of RFenergy that is rectified and stored in energy storage 160 that powersall of the integrated circuit components needing power.

Thereafter, this probe tone from the reader continues and can be used bysynchronization unit 161 to synchronize and phase lock the output oftransmitter 154 to the tone. Since all other microradios aresynchronized to this tone they will be synchronized to each.

More specifically, in terms of phase coherency, it is important that notonly should there, be no conflict between the pulse envelopes indicativeof the digital data, it is also important that the transmitters for eachof the RFID chips operate coherently with respect to the othertransmitters of the other chips. This permits the aforementioned powerlevel increase as well as maintaining better control over the generationof the pulse envelopes corresponding to the ones in zeroes of the datato be transmitted from the microradio through the antenna to the reader.

The synchronization occurs by tapping off the normal 900 megahertzsignal from the reader after energy storage 160 has produced enoughenergy to power the transmitter. Transmitter 154 is locked intosynchronism with the waveform from the reader that arrives at antenna 14and is supplied to synchronization unit 161 to control transmitter 154utilizing phase lock loop technology.

Optionally, each microradio may adaptively tune itself to generatemaximum output by for instance sensing the VSWR on the transmitter path.

Thereafter, upon transmission of an additional query signal decoded byreceiver 148, seed 150 is installed in pseudo-random number generator146, with this seed setting the time slot for the transmission of theindicated information from transmitter 154 out through antenna 14.

In one embodiment a unit such as a circulator 162 isolates the receiversection of the RFID chip from its transmitter section.

As discussed in the aforementioned patent applications, the RFIDmicroradio is first programmed with the particular identification numberof the item to which it is to be attached, plus a unique seed number.This programming is established by receipt of programming signalsantenna 14, which are received by receiver 148 and decoded so as to setseed 150, in this case to a value SEED A.

After the programming step, a query from the reader is detected byreceiver and decoder 148 in accordance with information stored in memory164. This in turn produces a signal on line 166 to install seed 150 inthe pseudo-random number generator to ensure the keying of transmitter154 in the same time slot.

As can be seen in this illustration, identical. RFID chips 170, 172, 174and 176 are each provided with identical seeds, namely SEED A, so thatupon receipt of an interrogation signal at antenna 14, each of the RFIDchips acts in exactly the same manner to transmit exactly the sameinformation at the same time in the same time slot. In this manner, themicroscopic microradios or RFID chips have their outputs addedcoherently so that what is transmitted from antenna 14 is the samesignal and the various chips cooperate rather than competing with oneanother. Without this coherence, scrambled signals that could not beunderstood by the reader could result.

What has thus been described is the operation of a single tag havingmultiple microradios, which in the aggregate provide a robust tag outputsignal for item-level tagging at an extremely low cost per tag.

While the above description has involved the use of microradios tuned tothe same frequency, it is within the scope of the present invention thatthe microradios can be tuned to different frequencies. One applicationof having microradios at a single feed point tuned to differentfrequencies is that if there is a failure of one of the microradios atone frequency, probing at a different frequency will result in anoperational tag. Also, for dual frequency tagging systems it would beimportant to have microradios tuned to those different frequencies.

While the present invention has been described in connection with thepreferred embodiments of the various figures, it is to be understoodthat other similar embodiments may be used or modifications or additionsmay be made to the described embodiment for performing the same functionof the present invention without deviating therefrom. Therefore, thepresent invention should not be limited to any single embodiment, butrather construed in breadth and scope accordance with the recitation ofthe appended claims. what is claimed is:

1. In an RFID tag system, a tag having at least two integrated circuits.2. The RFID tag system of claim 1, wherein each of said integratedcircuits includes a microradio.
 3. The RFID tag system of claim 1,wherein each of said integrated circuits includes an RFID microradiochip.
 4. The RFID tag system of claim 3, wherein said microradio chips,when transmitting, transmit coherently.
 5. The RFID tag system of claim4, wherein coherent operation includes microradio chips outputting thesame signal at the same amplitude in the same time slot and in which thesignals exhibit phase coherency one to the other.
 6. The RFID tag systemof claim 1, wherein said tag includes an antenna having a feed point andwherein said at least two integrated circuits are coupled to the feedpoint of said tag antenna.
 7. The RFID tag system of claim 6, whereinsaid integrated circuits include microradios and wherein saidmicroradios, when transmitting through said antenna, transmitcooperatively.
 8. The RFID tag system of claim 6, wherein said at leasttwo integrated circuits are deposited over the feed point of saidantenna through a printing process in which said integrated circuits areimmersed in a non-conductive fluid constituting an ink and wherein saidink is deposited by printing over the feed point of said antenna,whereby at least two of said integrated circuits are coupled to the feedpoint of said antenna.
 9. A method for establishing robust communicationbetween an RFID reader having a transmit antenna and an RFID tag havinga receive antenna including a feed point, comprising the step ofproviding a number of RFID integrated circuit microradio chips at thefeed point of said antenna such that at least two of the RFID microradiochips are effectively coupled to the antenna.
 10. The method of claim 9,wherein the RFD integrated circuit microradio chips are made to operatecooperatively.
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the range of the tagis increased due to the cooperative operation of the RFID integratedcircuit microradio chips.
 12. A testless system for providing an RFIDtag in an RFID system, including an RFID reader and a tag, comprisingthe steps of: providing the RFID tag with an antenna having a feedpoint; and, depositing multiple RFID integrated circuit microradio chipsat the feed point of said antenna, whereby there will be enoughoperational RFID integrated circuit microradio chips properly coupled tothe feed point of the antenna that individual testing of either an RFIDintegrated circuit microradio chip or its coupling to the feed point ofsaid antenna is unnecessary.
 13. In an RFID tag system in which a taghas an antenna with a feed point, a method for improving the performanceof the system comprising the step of providing multiple RFID integratedcircuit microradio chips at the feed point of the antenna.
 14. Themethod of claim 13, wherein the step of providing multiple RFIDintegrated circuit microradio chips at the antenna feed point includesthe steps of providing a non-conductive fluid with a number of RFIDintegrated circuit microradio chips entrained therein; patterning thefluid over the feed point of the antenna; and, patterning at least oneelectrode on top of the non-conductive fluid.
 15. The method of claim14, and further including the step of aligning the RFID integratedcircuit microradio chips in the non-conductive fluid so as to permitcoupling thereof to the antenna feed point.
 16. The method of claim 13,and further including the step of controlling the polarization of theRFID integrated circuit microradio chips such that all of the RFIDintegrated circuit microradio chips that are coupled to the antenna feedpoint are provided with the same polarization to provide cooperativeaction.
 17. The method of claim 13, and further including the step ofproviding each of the RFID integrated circuit microradio chips with apseudo-random number generator for the control of the timing slot atwhich the RFID integrated circuit microradio chip transmits andproviding identical seeds to all of the RFID integrated circuitmicroradio chips in the non-conductive fluid such that all of the RFIDintegrated circuit microradio chips transmit in the same time slot, thusto assist in providing cooperative microradio chip operation.
 18. In anRFID tag system a tag having at, least two integrated circuitmicroradios tuned to different frequencies.